(no subject)
Sep. 27th, 2010 09:56 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
[Poll #1624494]
Man, if people were worried about deer and rabbits getting into their garden, just imagine what will happen when people start growing things others would actually want to steal! Even indoor operations won't be safe. It's not like people in this area haven't been robbed/killed for their marijuana plants before.
Man, if people were worried about deer and rabbits getting into their garden, just imagine what will happen when people start growing things others would actually want to steal! Even indoor operations won't be safe. It's not like people in this area haven't been robbed/killed for their marijuana plants before.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-27 05:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-27 05:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-27 05:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-27 05:40 pm (UTC)Yeah, I think these dreams of tons o' tax revenue are a bunch of BS.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-27 05:43 pm (UTC)WTF?!?
no subject
Date: 2010-09-27 05:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-27 06:08 pm (UTC)Private property is just that, damn it. Of course, I might be biased because I view most Homeowners' Associations (HOA) with suspicion and disdain.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-28 08:29 am (UTC)---
# California (California Penal Code § 198.5 sets forth that unlawful, forcible entry into one's residence by someone not a member of the household creates the presumption that the resident held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily injury should he or she use deadly force against the intruder. This would make the homicide justifiable under CPC § 197 [3]. CALCRIM 506 gives the instruction, "A defendant is not required to retreat. He or she is entitled to stand his or her ground and defend himself or herself and, if reasonably necessary, to pursue an assailant until the danger ... has passed. This is so even if safety could have been achieved by retreating." However, it also states that "[People v. Ceballos] specifically held that burglaries which 'do not reasonably create a fear of great bodily harm' are not sufficient 'cause for exaction of human life.'” The court held that because a "trap-gun" was used, the doctrine did not apply. [4]
---
So, if someone broke into your house to steal your pot, I believe it WOULD be a justified use of deadly force since the breaking and entering creates an automatic presumption of threat to life and limb.
Pot in the yard, though, you're probably hosed.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-28 04:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-27 05:03 pm (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_19_%282010%29
no subject
Date: 2010-09-27 05:33 pm (UTC)I haven't read the legislation yet. I'm waiting for it to come in the mail.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-27 05:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-27 05:23 pm (UTC)How is your icon wearing a purple shirt?
no subject
Date: 2010-09-27 05:42 pm (UTC)Once you enable cyrillic services though, you can buy lots of different kinds, but I'm cheap and went with the free one. :D
Well, damn, that would have made farmers' markets way more interesting.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-28 02:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-28 04:09 am (UTC)